Skip to main content

Patriarchy and its Problems in the Contemporary

The progress of civilizations in different parts of the world has taken a definite shape, with certain common institutions emerging across cultures and historical periods. Patriarchy is one such institution that has been deeply entrenched in societies worldwide, including India. In patriarchal societies, the distinction between the ‘public’ and ‘private’ spheres for women is rigidly defined, with various boundaries imposed. These boundaries determine the extent of women’s freedoms and significantly impact their life chances in areas such as health, education, and employment. Societal norms and values often justify these restrictions in the name of preserving patriarchy. The most powerful among these values is the perceived right to make decisions that shape not only the lives but also the desires of women, reinforcing the notion that control over their bodies and choices rests with men.

The power embedded in gender difference has profoundly influenced societal structures, leading to an equilibrium where patriarchal norms and values are mistakenly perceived as fundamental to social stability. This justification is often couched in terms of the functionality of social institutions. Extensive writings on morality have further reinforced these gendered hierarchies, often serving as philosophical validations of existing power structures rather than genuine inquiries into ethical fairness. Many apologist philosophers have rationalized the subjugation of women under the guise of moral or social order, while religious institutions have played a significant role in perpetuating these structures.

Patriarchy not only governs women’s bodies but also dictates broader societal dynamics. Various theories attempt to explain its origins, some more convincing than others. However, the key to women’s emancipation does not lie in antiquated theories but in contemporary realities. The concept of ‘modernity,’ which was once celebrated for its promise of rational progress, has not necessarily dismantled patriarchal structures. Instead, the materialist orientation of modernity has led to further objectification of women, a trend exacerbated by capitalism.

Globalization, as the most advanced form of capitalism, has transformed political and social landscapes, redefining concepts such as nation-state and citizenship. It has also altered the status of women in society, commodifying emotions and relationships. Love, for example, is now easily accessible, marketed, and exchanged as a commodity, making it more appealing yet more transactional. The so-called ‘religion of consumerism’ has reshaped social perceptions of women, exposing the inherent contradictions within the Enlightenment ideals that once promised equality and rational progress.

The ideological basis of female oppression remains obscured for the masses due to widespread societal justifications. The creation of ‘pink-collar jobs’—which are often lower-paid and gender-segregated—reinforces existing inequalities under the pretext of biological and social norms. Sexual harassment is pervasive, and judicial insensitivity toward gender issues (as seen in pre-Mathura case rulings) has further discouraged women from seeking justice. A significant proportion of reported rapes involve perpetrators known to the victims, highlighting the oppressive role of familial and community structures in perpetuating gender-based violence.

The December 16, 2012, gang rape incident in Delhi prompted widespread outrage, leading to calls for gender-sensitive education, moral value inculcation, better policing, amendments in criminal procedure laws, police reforms, special police forces for women, and broader empowerment initiatives. While some measures were implemented, fundamental structural changes remained unaddressed, and crime rates against women have not shown significant improvement.

Value inculcation must take place within families, educational institutions, and society at large, especially in response to the emergence of new forms of gender-based crimes. However, external conditions must also be made conducive to meaningful change. Issues such as poverty, hunger, unemployment, corruption, the rise of the middle class, and technological advancements all have gendered dimensions and must be analyzed holistically. The prevailing notion of women’s empowerment must also be re-evaluated to encompass comprehensive, rather than isolated, economic or social empowerment.

Superficial measures taken to pacify protestors and media outrage will not yield lasting solutions. The need of the hour is a gender-sensitive state committed to ensuring equality of opportunity for all genders. Reforms across sectors—including policies such as granting subsidies in the name of female heads of households—can contribute to changing societal mindsets and fostering long-term gender equality. Every small step in this direction brings us closer to achieving a more just society, where the long-standing dream of gender equality is finally realized.

Comments

Total Pageviews

Visitors

Flag Counter

Popular posts from this blog

Colonial Govenmentality by David Scott

The discourses surrounding colonialism have been actively examined by historians and social scientists. Some, such as the Cambridge School, have adopted an orthodox approach, viewing colonial history primarily from a European perspective. In contrast, historians of the colonized have sought to move away from a Eurocentric narrative, often neglecting the discursive and non-discursive dimensions of colonialism. Foucault, through his concept of “governmentality,” demonstrated how political rationalities of power facilitated the acceptance of colonial transformations by the subjects themselves. A significant focus of recent discussions on colonialism has been its exclusionary practices, including the racial exclusion of the colonized from humanity and their political marginalization through false liberalism. On one hand, critiques have revealed how colonial textuality operated at the level of images and narratives, distorting representations of the colonized and denying them autonomy, v...

Book Review: Walby, Sylvia. Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell, 1990.

The rapidly changing modes of economic production and social norms make the theoretical categories obsolete after same time. Various school of thoughts generate some kind of framework to study the social reality. The generated frameworks generally make some assumptions about the social reality. Sylvia Walby in the book “Theorizing Patriarchy” finds that different feminist schools of thought are not able to show contemporary reality of the society. So, she tries to find out the problems in the dominant schools of feminist thoughts. She has divided the book into eight chapters and in the first chapter “Introduction” lays out the problems of contemporary women and the explanations given by various theories. She finds four different theoretical perspectives in feminist thoughts--  Radical feminism, Marxist Feminism, Liberal Feminism and Dual-Systems Theory. In all the chapters, she discusses the arguments posed by these schools of thoughts and the counter arguments to show problems i...

Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge

Book Review Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Bernard S. Cohn. Princeton University Press, 1996. Xvii+189pp. The acceptance and maintenance of colonial power in any country is not dependent only upon the military strength or the capacity to coerce the voices of masses but also on the development of knowledge to understand the subjects. The development of knowledge by the imperial power of East Indian Company and crown (after 1858) to invent the history of the colonized and see through it the ways and means of ruling and maintaining the empire was the ‘cultural’ domain of the colonial history. Bernard Cohn uses the principles of anthropology in sync with the methods of history to study colonialism and its forms of knowledge. This book consists of four essays, foreword by Nicholas Dirk and introduction to the book. These essays are written in the time period between 1950s and 1980s. In this era, the Chicago school’s method of ‘ethnosociology’ wa...